Digital Comedy as Democratic Participation: Reimagining Public Discourse Through Humour in India’s Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53032/tvcr/2025.v7n3.37Keywords:
Digital comedy, democratic participation, communicative action, public sphere theory, political humour, civic engagement, digital media, deliberation, civic engagementAbstract
This interpretative review develops Digital Communicative Comedy (DCC), a framework for understanding how online humour in India functions as democratic participation. Integrating comedy studies with Habermas’s communicative action and public sphere theory—alongside critiques by Fraser and Young—and digital media research on platform affordances, the paper argues that comedic texts can articulate validity claims (truth, rightness, sincerity) through humour, inviting audience uptake and deliberation in networked publics. Focusing on Indian stand-up and short-form satire, the review theorizes how platform logics (algorithms, monetization, moderation) mediate visibility, risk, and discursive quality, and how cultural specificity strengthens comedy’s civic legibility. The paper argues that digital comedy, as illustrated by comedians such as Kunal Kamra, Varun Grover, and Vir Das, provides new avenues for civic participation that circumvent traditional gatekeepers, generating an atmosphere for democratic discourse. The paper outlines an analytic template for coding comedic validity claims and proposes research designs to test democratic outcomes (cross-cutting interaction, issue reframing, civic intent). DCC thus reframes digital comedy from “mere entertainment” to a participatory discourse repertoire within South Asia’s evolving public spheres.
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Indiana University Press, 1984.
Baumgartner, Jody, and Jonathan S. Morris. “The Daily Show Effect: Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy, and American Youth.” American Politics Research, vol. 34, no. 3, 2006, pp. 341-367.
Benhabib, Seyla. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Psychology Press, 1992.
Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Bergson, Henri. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Macmillan, 1911.
Boulianne, Shelley. “Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Current Research.” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 18, no. 5, 2015, pp. 524-538.
Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press, 2000.
Charmaraman, Linda, et al. “Social Media Use and Democratic Engagement Among Marginalized Youth.” Journal of Digital Media & Policy, vol. 13, no. 2, 2022, pp. 145-168.
Dahlgren, Peter. “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation.” Political Communication, vol. 22, no. 2, 2005, pp. 147-162.
Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text, no. 25/26, 1990, pp. 56-80.
Gray, Jonathan, et al. Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era. NYU Press, 2009.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. MIT Press, 1989.
---. The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press, 1981.
Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press, 2006.
Kuipers, Giselinde. Good Humour, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Walter de Gruyter, 2006.
Loader, Brian D., and Dan Mercea. “Networking Democracy? Social Media Innovations and Participatory Politics.” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 14, no. 6, 2011, pp. 757-769.
Lockyer, Sharon, and Michael Pickering. Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Mintz, Lawrence E. “Standup Comedy as Social and Cultural Mediation.” American Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, 1985, pp. 71-80.
Morozov, Evgeny. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. Public Affairs, 2011.
Pal, Joyojeet. “The Tectonics of Online Political Humour in India.” Television & New Media, vol. 21, no. 4, 2020, pp. 373-393.
Papacharissi, Zizi. A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. Routledge, 2010.
Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press, 2011.
Rattanasevee, Pattharapong, et al. “Direct Democracy in the Digital Age: Opportunities, Challenges, and New Approaches.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, 2024, article 1681, doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04245-1.
Sunstein, Cass R. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press, 2017.
Tufekci, Zeynep. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press, 2018.
Udupa, Sahana. “Nationalism in the Digital Age: Fun as a Metapractice of Extreme Speech.” International Journal of Communication, vol. 13, 2019, pp. 3143-3163.
Vaishnavi, S. “Political Satire in Indian Stand-up Comedy: Analyzing the Role of Comedians in Contemporary Discourse.” Interdisciplinary Research Journal of Humanities, 2024, pp. 34-56.
Villa, Dana R. “Postmodern Antimodernism: Habermas and Derrida.” New German Critique, no. 56, 1992, pp. 39-60.
Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Voice of Creative Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
